But many external consultants sometimes make this story seem true.
Go to any Government department - you will find many cookie-cutter reports full of half-baked ideas gathering dust on bookshelves and file racks. Some recommendations await implementation long after the consultant has returned to his country. In the process resources are expended but not much value is added, which is a problem.

I was wondering why Bhutanese consultants are not recruited. There are many qualified individuals capable of delivering results and there are clear benefits in recruiting them:
1. They are familiar with the way things work in Bhutan and it is easier for them to understand the problems/issues at hand.
2. They belong to the society and have their practices established in Bhutan. The quality of work they deliver has implications for them as citizens and business, and thus have incentives and motivations to do a good job.
3. Being locally based, they are cheaper and easily accessible during and after the assignment.
4. You do not have to host them in hotels, provide them a guide to teach Bhutan history and take them for sight-seeing. They will be more focused on the assignment.
They definitely sound a better value for our money.
But this demands a change in the attitude of those who procure these services. They must realise that 'external' isn't necessarily 'quality and efficiency'. They should trust the capability of our local consultants and encourage them to engage with the Government.
